Why is Article 2 of the Constitution regarding the executive office considered vague?

Article 2 of the Constitution, which outlines the powers and responsibilities of the executive branch, is considered vague for several reasons, primarily rooted in the founders' intentions and the context of its creation. The founders designed this section to allow flexibility in the interpretation and application of presidential powers, which was partly influenced by their trust in George Washington as a leader.

By trusting Washington, they intended to establish a strong yet adaptable executive authority. This founding trust allowed them to focus less on detailed specifications of presidential powers and more on the principle of the office itself. As a result, the language of Article 2 is not always definitive, which has led to broader interpretations over time as different presidents have approached their roles in diverse ways.

This inherent vagueness facilitates the executive's ability to respond to unforeseen challenges and changing political landscapes, but it also means that the powers of the president can evolve and be interpreted differently depending on the individual in office. Thus, the trust placed in Washington and the desire for a flexible framework contribute significantly to the vagueness of Article 2.